![]() ![]() Dunn has said he didn’t have his finger on the trigger of his rifle, according to his FBI interview. (Stephen Horn/Screenshot via The Epoch Times)ĭunn and at least two very agitated protesters in the crowd were shouting at each other. An Oath Keepers member gets in between a protester and a Capitol Police officer during a tense exchange in the Small House Rotunda on Jan. According to video footage from an independent journalist, and portions of the FBI summary of Dunn’s interview reviewed by The Epoch Times, a group of Oath Keepers came upon a volatile standoff in the Small House Rotunda at 2:48 p.m. Two FBI agents interviewed Dunn on May 18, 2021, about the incident in the Small House Rotunda. “These public tweets from journalists reporting on Mehta’s public warning are visible as an incredible event in the already farcical prosecution,” Moseley said. Moseley claims the doc lost its protective order status Mehta: i decide when something's lost that status. Judge Mehta says that if Mosely does he will be in contempt of court and he urges us (reporters) to tweet that out so Moseley will know that. Racine journal times trial#In response, Mehta took the unusual step of telling the news media covering the trial to post messages on social media to Moseley saying that he would be jailed if he released the document. Prosecutor Jeffrey Nestler informed Judge Amit Mehta that Moseley was “threatening” to release a sealed document. 6 during the seditious-conspiracy trial of Oath Keepers founder Elmer Stewart Rhodes III and four co-defendants, Kelly Meggs, Kenneth Harrelson, Jessica Watkins, and Thomas Caldwell. The FBI document in question, a Form 302 summary of Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn’s interview with two special agents, came up in open court on Oct. “We typically do not comment on cases beyond our public statements and filings to the court, and have no comment,” Miller told The Epoch Times in an email. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, declined to comment on Moseley’s statements. William Miller, public information officer for the U.S. The prosecution’s entire case is a fraud upon the American people.” This is absolute proof that there never was any insurrection or seditious conspiracy. Capitol Police against the mob?” Moseley asked. “If the Oath Keepers were involved in any way in any insurrection or conspiracy to obstruct the Joint Session of Congress on January 6, would they turn and stand between the U.S. “No one who engages in seditious conspiracy or insurrection stops to come to the aid of the police against the mob. Capitol on January 6-proves that the prosecution is lying to the jury,” Moseley said in the statement ( pdf). “This document-together with a photograph of the moment inside the U.S. Capitol Police officer shows the Oath Keepers protected the officer from an angry mob near the Capitol Rotunda on the afternoon of Jan. Racine journal times license#Jonathon Moseley, who previously represented Oath Keepers defendant Kelly Meggs before his law license was revoked, said an FBI interview with a U.S. An FBI document being kept from the public under court seal undermines the government’s seditious-conspiracy case against the Oath Keepers, shows that the indicted members of the group “are not guilty,” and “proves that the prosecution is lying to the jury,” a former Oath Keepers attorney said in a statement provided to The Epoch Times on Oct. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |